Schema + llms.txt: speak the machines' language.
We generate and review structured data, llms.txt files, AI-crawler access rules and citation summaries - the technical layer that lets machines read your business precisely.
What you get
- Organization, Service, FAQ, Article and local schema - valid, connected, matching visible content
- llms.txt written for your actual priorities - not a template
- AI-crawler policy in robots.txt: deliberate and documented
- Verification against live public tools - see it working, not just installed
How it works — simply
- We map: what your pages actually contain and claim
- We encode: that truth as structured data and guidance files
- We verify: with the same public checkers anyone can run - including you
Who this is for
Any site serious about AI-era visibility - this is the entry ticket. Our own 225-page site carries 333 valid schema blocks and zero broken ones; that standard is what we install.
Questions people ask
Does llms.txt actually matter?
It is a readiness signal, not a ranking lever - it helps AI systems summarize you correctly and shows deliberate AI-era care. Cheap to add, increasingly expected; most citation studies find cited pages use structured signals heavily.
Can bad schema hurt me?
Yes - broken JSON-LD reads as untrustworthy testimony, and schema that does not match visible content violates Google's guidelines. That is why every block we ship is validated and matched to the page.
I already have some schema - do you audit it?
Yes, review is often where we start: many sites carry auto-generated schema that is broken, duplicated or dishonest without anyone knowing. Our free tools show validity instantly.